Modified engineering plastics · Formulation development, sampling & worldwide export
IATF 16949 · ISO 9001 · Testing on requestFree samplingWorldwide export24h reply
+86 532 6896 5111 wg@cplastics.com.cn

PA6 GF30 Versus GF50: When Should You Step Up to GF50?

GF50 adds about 60% stiffness but loses flow, worsens fibre show and doubles tool wear — worth it only in specific cases.

Product Gallery2026-07-15

Data comparison

Typical PA6 GF30: density 1.36 g/cm³, tensile strength 165 MPa, flexural modulus 8,500 MPa, notched impact 11 kJ/m², HDT 205 °C.

Typical PA6 GF50: density 1.56 g/cm³, tensile strength 205 MPa, flexural modulus 14,000 MPa, notched impact 13 kJ/m², HDT 215 °C. Strength and modulus climb clearly, but impact barely improves.

The real cost of GF50

Lower flow makes thin walls hard to fill, usually demanding larger gates and higher injection pressure, which in turn raises internal stress.

Fibre show: at 50% loading fibres break through the surface readily, so cosmetic parts are largely out; internal parts or post-painting are the only options.

Tool wear: high glass loading accelerates abrasion of screw, barrel and tooling — especially gates and cores — and upgraded steel belongs in the cost model.

When GF50 is genuinely needed

Structural parts where flexural modulus is the governing design constraint — brackets replacing die-cast aluminium, automotive engine mounts, industrial parts under sustained static load.

Where deflection allowance is generous and impact loading dominates, GF30 or even toughened GF25 usually fits better and saves tooling cost.

Published 2026-07-15 · Product Gallery · Selection guidance only; refer to agreed technical documents for release data.

Related Grades

Related Articles

Need advice for your specific duty cycle?

Send us wall thickness, temperature, load and volume — technical reply and pricing within 24 hours.

Call Email